prisoner_24601: Dragon Age (Default)
prisoner_24601 ([personal profile] prisoner_24601) wrote2007-03-21 08:25 am
Entry tags:

Some thoughts about popularity vs. quality...

I am constantly fascinated about what makes a story popular and how does and doesn't relate to the quality of the story in question. Sometimes the stars align and you end up with something amazing that is both popular and well written (Heroes is a good example of this). Unfortunately, it seems that far more often they don't and that something is either wildly popular and sucks ass or is freaking brilliant and criminally overlooked.

I don't really mind that the stuff that I find mediocre is popular. Although I am baffled by it, I tend to write it off as a subjective taste thing. And I also realize that not everyone is going to agree with me about what a quality piece of fiction is - and that's okay. If everyone had the same taste, that would be horrible really. And hey, as I've gotten older, my tastes have totally changed. When I was a teenager, I loved wanky romances and poorly written fantasy novels staring blatant mary sue characters, and I don't think there is anything wrong with that, but the older I got and the more that I read, the picker I've gotten. I think partially that's because the more you read, the more you realize how certain things are clichés or just ripped off of other writers who did it better in their story (yes Robert Jordan… I’m talking to you, you asshat.).

When it comes to my own personal taste - it seems like if I like whatever it is - it's doomed to early cancellation or obscurity (I like to call this the Prisoner24601 effect). I keep waiting for Battlestar Galactica to get canceled because I really love it (especially now that the wanky Starbuck/Apollo romance seems to be over).

I admit that I find it frustrating when I stumble across stuff that's so brilliant and no one is watching or reading. There are tons of examples of this in popular media and hell even in our own little tiny fandom. I mean, we live in a world where Firefly was canceled but a show like Everyone Loves Raymond (which I admit - I could never stand) was the number one show for years. In television and movies, it seems like the more bland the entertainment is, the more likely it's going to be popular.

There are some truly amazing pieces of fan fic in our community that that have been criminally overlooked (and I'm not talking about my own stuff - which I think gets a nice amount of feedback actually) or aren't even as remotely popular as they should be - and I just don't get it. It seems like if something isn't a romance, light side or fluffy, that people simply tune out. And I don't see anything wrong with people wanting those kinds of stories - it's just that I wish people would be more open to other kinds of stories too.

Anyone have any thoughts on this?

[identity profile] midnight-hawk.livejournal.com 2007-03-21 04:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that when, in popular media, things that are critically acclaimed and are cancelled because of bad ratings, it means that in five or ten years time all the popular shows in the same genre will be emulating them.

I think it's similar to how each generation sees a certain movie in a different way: Something that was subversive, controversial and original for the generation of its time, can become ordinary for the next.

I'm stil pissed that Angel got five seasons that I found sucky, while Firefly didn't get a full one.

[identity profile] prisoner--24601.livejournal.com 2007-03-21 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Hahaha I think you're right. I can think of two shows off of the top of my head (Twin Peaks and Star Trek) that were before their time ended up getting canceled, but still influencing entire genres of shows.

I mean, so many shows owe a debt to Twin Peaks that it's not even funny. You can see it's influence throughout all of Joss Whedon's stuff (he even pays direct homage to it at one point) and in shows like Battlestar Galactica (every time Baltar and imaginary six have a dream conversation, I think of Twin Peaks lol). Same goes with Star Trek - although that was a bit different as it started it's own franchise too. But still it did influence a lot of sci-fi shows that came after.

It's kind of interesting that often while a lot of people don't watch those shows, a part of the small audience of fans tend to be other authors that then carry those influences into their more successful stuff. It's kind of cool really.